A. O. Scott

Chief Film Critic, The New York Times
Author, Better Living Through Criticism

The digital transformation of media and popular culture

Add to Shortlist @aoscott


As a film critic at the New York Times for nearly two decades, A.O. Scott has had a front-row seat for the digital transformation of media and popular culture. He has written extensively about the ways that Hollywood has responded (and failed to respond) to the challenges of television and the Internet, and about how the rapid evolution of digital technology has changed the images we consume and the ways we consume them.

With equal measures of skepticism and enthusiasm, he takes on big Hollywood blockbusters, independent films and documentaries, and seeks out cinematic treasures from around the world. His reviews provide indispensable consumer guidance, and his essays help readers understand the meaning and context of a powerful and protean art form. A frequent presence on television and radio — including dozens of appearances on Charlie Rose, Morning Joe, CBS This Morning and many public radio programs — he was a co-host on the last season of At The Movies, the long-running syndicated movie-review show founded by Roger Ebert and Gene Siskel. With his colleague the late David Carr, media columnist at the Times, Scott developed and co-hosted The Sweet Spot, a pioneering web video series about media and culture.

Scott’s first book, Better Living Through Criticism: How to Think About Art, Pleasure, Beauty and Truth (Penguin Press, 2016) is a wide-ranging defense of criticism as a style of thinking, an open-minded, skeptical approach to the world that is available to everyone. Rather than defend the prerogatives of his own embattled profession, Scott suggests that the critical impulse is part of our creative DNA as a species, and an essential tool in our ongoing effort to make sense of our experiences. Moving beyond film and popular culture into literature and the fine arts, the book argues for the fundamental importance of the arts.

A graduate of Harvard College, where he majored in comparative literature, Scott holds an MA in English from Johns Hopkins. He has taught at Hopkins, Cooper Union and other institutions, and is currently Distinguished Professor of Film Criticism at Wesleyan University. He lives with his family in Brooklyn, New York.


Better Living Through Criticism

How to Think about Art, Pleasure, Beauty, and Truth

A. O. Scott

The New York Times film critic shows why we need criticism now more than ever

Few could explain, let alone seek out, a career in criticism. Yet what A.O. Scott shows in Better Living Through Criticism is that we are, in fact, all critics: because critical thinking informs almost every aspect of artistic creation, of civil action, of interpersonal life. With penetrating insight and warm humor, Scott shows that while individual critics — himself included — can make mistakes and find flaws where they shouldn't, criticism as a discipline is one of the noblest, most creative, and urgent activities of modern existence.

Using his own film criticism as a starting point — everything from his infamous dismissal of the international blockbuster The Avengers to his intense affection for Pixar's animated Ratatouille — Scott expands outward, easily guiding readers through the complexities of Rilke and Shelley, the origins of Chuck Berry and the Rolling Stones, the power of Marina Abramovich and 'Ode on a Grecian Urn.' Drawing on the long tradition of criticism from Aristotle to Susan Sontag, Scott shows that real criticism was and always will be the breath of fresh air that allows true creativity to thrive. "The time for criticism is always now," Scott explains, "because the imperative to think clearly, to insist on the necessary balance of reason and passion, never goes away."

Jonathan Cape (24 Mar. 2016)
Penguin Press (Feb 2016)


Reviews: In 'Better Living Through Criticism', A.O. Scott Defends His JobThe New York Times
Says YouThe New Yorker
The Critic as ArtistSlate


Maclean's Non-Fiction Bestseller

“In this book, as in his reviews, Scott’s voice is genial, reasonable and self-aware. He elucidates complex ideas with snappy language. He’s funny, but not cynical or snarky…. What he does especially well is explain how art develops and why our varied responses to it matter, pinpointing where criticism fits into the equation.”

“Mr. Scott is very intelligent….What may matter more is that Mr. Scott is fun to read…[Scott] says that the simple questions—always with complex answers—that criticism poses are: ‘Did you feel that?’ ‘Was it good for you?’ ‘Tell the Truth.’ He reminds us that critical judgments, like art itself, demand intellectual and sensuous, even sexual, responses. Mr. Scott answers his own demands….”
Wall Street Journal

“Rousing and erudite.”
San Francisco Chronicle

“Witty and thoughtful…. Reading Scott's book is like watching the stiff-upper-lipped hero of a British 1940s thriller facing down his or her adversaries — modest, brave and utterly unflappable.”
Los Angeles Times

“If we were looking for an intelligent, informed and often funny account of why we can’t live comfortably with criticism (in any of the word’s meanings), and can’t live without it, either, we need look no further, and shall probably want to read this book more than once….”
New York Times

“Impassioned and deeply thoughtful ….Scott lays out a taxonomy of meaningful thought (and the meaning of thought itself)….His disciplined reasoning, impressive erudition, and deep commitment to his art (as he defines it) are never less than provocative and elegantly articulated. A zealous and well-considered work of advocacy for an art too often unappreciated and misunderstood.”

"This stunning treatise on criticism from New York Times film critic Scott is a complete success, comprehensively demonstrating the value of his art...a necessary work that may enter the canon of great criticism."
Publisher's Weekly starred review


How America's Comedians Became More Intellectual than Many of Its Politicians | bigthink

Better Living Through Criticism | Politics and Prose

Why critics' opinions matter | PRI Audio Interview